Independent Reading Analysis Essay Rubric
Beginning 1 | Developing 2 | Accomplished 3 | Exemplary 4 | Score | |
Thesis Statement | Paper does not appear to have an identifiable thesis | Thesis may be hard to locate. Writer frequently strays from thesis | Paper has an identifiable thesis but it may be hard to locate or too narrow or too broad. Writer may stray from thesis at times | Thesis controls the entire paper and is specific enough to limit the paper appropriately . | |
Evidence | Writer fails to support her points with references to the text. | Writer provides some evidence from the text, but not enough to support her points. Or she fails to provide necessary commentary to link evidence to her points. | Writer provides evidence from the text, but it may not be sufficient to prove her points. Or writer relies too much on the text and fails to provide sufficient commentary. | Thesis is adequately supported with evidence from the book. Paper contains a balance of commentary and concrete detail. | |
Organization | Paper is disorganized and unclear. Transitions are nonexistent. Introduction is misleading or absent. | Arguments may be scattered throughout the paper without appropriate grouping in paragraphs. Introductory paragraph may be misleading. | For the most part, arguments are presented logically and transitions are appropriate. There may be some confusion. | Arguments are presented logically. Introduction leads reader comfortably into the thesis. Writer provides appropriate transitions. | |
Conventions | Paper has enough grammar, punctuation and spelling errors to interfere with understanding. Missing draft and peer review. | Paper has numerous grammar, punctuation, spelling errors but meaning is intact. May be missing 1st draft and/or peer review. | Paper may have some grammar, punctuation and spelling errors. May be missing 1st draft and peer review. | Paper is carefully proofread for grammar, punctuation and spelling. Paper includes 1st draft and peer review. | |
Analysis | Writer fails to analyze the text and merely summarizes. | Writer may begin to analyze and drift into summary. Emphasis is on summary. | Paper shows evidence of analysis, but connections may not be strong or clear enough. | Writer applies critical reading skills to adequately “break down” the text. Focus is on “how,” not “what” of writing. |